DataQuest home > AYP home > Reports > Select District > District Reports > Current Page

2010-11 Accountability Progress Reporting (APR)


Local Educational Agency (LEA) Report
2011 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report

California Department of Education
Analysis, Measurement &
Accountability Reporting Division
8/13/2012

California Department of Education




    2011 AYP and PI Links:
LEA:  Paradise Unified
(An LEA is a school district or county office of education.)
LEA Type:  Unified
County:  Butte
CD Code:  04-61531
 


Made AYP:   No    
Met 14 of 26 AYP Criteria        

California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

Percent Proficient and Above Above 1.0 Exception Approved
English-Language Arts 1.2 Yes Yes
Mathematics 0.9 No

California Modified Assessment (CMA)

Percent Proficient and Above Cap Above Cap
English-Language Arts 0.9 2.0 No
Mathematics 0.7 2.1 No

Participation Rate

English-Language Arts
Target 95%
Met all participation rate criteria? Yes
  Mathematics
Target 95%
Met all participation rate criteria? Yes
GROUPS Enrollment
First
Day of
Testing
Number of Students Tested Rate Met 2011 AYP Criteria Alternative Method Enrollment
First
Day of
Testing
Number of Students Tested Rate Met 2011 AYP Criteria Alternative Method
LEA-wide 2460 2431 99 Yes 2460 2430 99 Yes
  Black or African American 12 12 100 -- 12 12 100 --
  American Indian or Alaska Native 22 22 100 -- 22 22 100 --
  Asian 24 24 100 -- 24 24 100 --
  Filipino 15 15 100 -- 15 15 100 --
  Hispanic or Latino 299 297 99 Yes 299 296 99 Yes
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 5 5 100 -- 5 5 100 --
  White 1899 1876 99 Yes 1899 1875 99 Yes
  Two or More Races 183 179 98 Yes 183 180 98 Yes
  Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1530 1516 99 Yes 1531 1515 99 Yes
  English Learners 37 37 100 -- 37 36 98 --
  Students with Disabilities 304 286 94 Yes Y2 304 286 94 Yes Y2

Percent Proficient - Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

English-Language Arts
Target  67.0 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria? No
  Mathematics
Target  67.3 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria? No
GROUPS Valid Scores Number At or Above Proficient Percent At or Above Proficient Met 2011 AYP Criteria Alternative Method Valid Scores Number At or Above Proficient Percent At or Above Proficient Met 2011 AYP Criteria Alternative Method
LEA-wide 2291 1196 52.2 No 2290 1090 47.6 No
  Black or African American 11 5 45.5 -- 11 1 9.1 --
  American Indian or Alaska Native 20 7 35.0 -- 20 6 30.0 --
  Asian 24 10 41.7 -- 24 13 54.2 --
  Filipino 11 8 72.7 -- 11 5 45.5 --
  Hispanic or Latino 272 130 47.8 No 270 120 44.4 No
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 4 -- -- -- 4 -- -- --
  White 1785 948 53.1 No 1785 858 48.1 No
  Two or More Races 163 85 52.1 No 164 85 51.8 No
  Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1453 636 43.8 No 1453 592 40.7 No
  English Learners 35 11 31.4 -- 34 14 41.2 --
  Students with Disabilities 268 71 26.5 No 269 57 21.2 No


Academic Performance Index (API) - Additional Indicator for AYP

2010 Base API 2011 Growth API 2010-11 Growth Met 2011 API Criteria Alternative Method
749 755 6 Yes  

2011 API Criteria for meeting federal AYP: A minimum "2011 Growth API" score of 710 OR "2010-11 Growth" of at least one point.

Graduation Rate Goal: 90 Percent

Current Year: Graduation Rate Results

2010 Graduation Rate
(Class of 2008-09)
2011 Graduation Rate
(Class of 2009-10)
2011 Target Graduation Rate 2011 Graduation Rate Criteria Met Alternative Method or Exclusion
83.66 89.24 84.36 Yes DA

Graduation Rate Criteria: (1) met or exceeded the goal of 90%, or (2) met the fixed target graduation rate, or (3) met the variable target graduation rate. Fixed and variable target graduation rates are calculated for local educational agencies and schools that have not reached the 90% goal.