DataQuest home > AYP home > Reports > Select District > District Reports > Current Page

2011-12 Accountability Progress Reporting (APR)


Local Educational Agency (LEA) Report
2012 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report

California Department of Education
Analysis, Measurement, &
Accountability Reporting Division
6/25/2013

California Department of Education




    2012 AYP and PI Links:
LEA:  Mountain View Whisman
(An LEA is a school district, county office of education, or statewide benefit charter.)
LEA Type:  Elementary
County:  Santa Clara
CD Code:  43-69591
 


Made AYP:   No    
Met 32 of 37 AYP Criteria        

California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

Percent Proficient and Above Above 1.0 Exception Approved
English-Language Arts 0.3 No
Mathematics 0.2 No

California Modified Assessment (CMA)

Percent Proficient and Above Cap Above Cap
English-Language Arts 2.6 2.7 No
Mathematics 2.0 2.8 No

Participation Rate

English-Language Arts
Target 95%
Met all participation rate criteria? Yes
  Mathematics
Target 95%
Met all participation rate criteria? Yes
GROUPS Enrollment
First
Day of
Testing
Number of Students Tested Rate Met 2012 AYP Criteria Alternative Method Enrollment
First
Day of
Testing
Number of Students Tested Rate Met 2012 AYP Criteria Alternative Method
LEA-wide 3663 3649 100 Yes 3661 3640 99 Yes
  Black or African American 78 77 99 -- 78 77 99 --
  American Indian or Alaska Native 6 6 100 -- 6 6 100 --
  Asian 396 394 99 Yes 396 391 99 Yes
  Filipino 137 137 100 Yes 137 137 100 Yes
  Hispanic or Latino 1724 1721 100 Yes 1722 1717 100 Yes
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 31 31 100 -- 31 31 100 --
  White 1001 993 99 Yes 1001 991 99 Yes
  Two or More Races 231 231 100 Yes 231 231 100 Yes
  Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1734 1732 100 Yes 1734 1728 100 Yes
  English Learners 1773 1773 100 Yes 1773 1769 100 Yes
  Students with Disabilities 533 527 99 Yes 533 526 99 Yes

Percent Proficient - Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)

English-Language Arts
Target  78.4 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria? No
  Mathematics
Target  79.0 %
Met all percent proficient rate criteria? No
GROUPS Valid Scores Number At or Above Proficient Percent At or Above Proficient Met 2012 AYP Criteria Alternative Method Valid Scores Number At or Above Proficient Percent At or Above Proficient Met 2012 AYP Criteria Alternative Method
LEA-wide 3517 2406 68.4 Yes SH 3509 2404 68.5 No
  Black or African American 71 47 66.2 -- 71 36 50.7 --
  American Indian or Alaska Native 5 -- -- -- 5 -- -- --
  Asian 371 318 85.7 Yes 368 322 87.5 Yes
  Filipino 133 106 79.7 Yes 133 105 78.9 Yes SH
  Hispanic or Latino 1671 820 49.1 No 1668 868 52.0 No
  Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 29 14 48.3 -- 29 13 44.8 --
  White 965 864 89.5 Yes 963 822 85.4 Yes
  Two or More Races 217 189 87.1 Yes 217 190 87.6 Yes
  Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 1702 824 48.4 Yes SH 1699 873 51.4 No
  English Learners 1748 902 51.6 Yes SH 1744 977 56.0 No
  Students with Disabilities 513 220 42.9 Yes SH 512 221 43.2 Yes SH


Academic Performance Index (API) - Additional Indicator for AYP

2011 Base API 2012 Growth API 2011-12 Growth Met 2012 API Criteria Alternative Method
833 855 22 Yes  

2012 API Criteria for meeting federal AYP: A minimum "2012 Growth API" score of 740 OR "2011-12 Growth" of at least one point.

Graduation Rate Goal: 90 Percent
Graduation Rate data not available.


Current Year: Graduation Rate Results

Graduation Rate data not available.

Graduation Rate Criteria: (1) met or exceeded the goal of 90%, or (2) met the fixed target graduation rate, or (3) met the variable target graduation rate. Fixed and variable target graduation rates are calculated for local educational agencies and schools that have not reached the 90% goal.